Brad Watts reviews the new Quantum 26 x 32 Thunderbolt Interface from PreSonus...
As I consistently accompaniment back reviewing PreSonus products, I’m a bonafide fan. Since 1995 the aggregation has accustomed itself as a amateur in the semi-pro audio assembly arena. Initial PreSonus interfaces, accordingly called ‘Fire something-or-other’, had advanced panels formed from blocks of aluminium. While they worked, and affiliated to a computer with a Firewire cable, they utilised Yamaha’s adverse mLan protocol. mLan was able in that it could carriage audio, MIDI data, and wordclock over a Firewire cable, but the patching software was archaic, and PreSonus confused on to ‘proper’ Firewire.
The PreSonus Quantum leaves Firewire and USB abaft with Thunderbolt 2 for abstracts transport. It’s a awfully quicker apparatus than the antecedent USB 3.0 Studio 192. The Quantum can be daisy-chained via Thunderbolt for up to 96 channels over four units, article Firewire promised but never delivered. The Quantum offers eight mic/line inputs and eight band TRS outputs, with amplification via ADAT optical. SMUX is accurate for 96kHz recording beyond all accessible inputs – 16 ADAT channels at 44.1/48kHz, and eight at 88.2/96kHz.
The Quantum represents PreSonus’s aboriginal devious from its signature blue/silver colour arrangement in barter for atramentous – how actual rock. On brief analysis the alone absolute change from Studio 192 models is the accession of MIDI ports. A distinct ascribe and achievement is affluence nowadays with abounding users application basic instruments.
So afar from MIDI ports and a blatant atramentous finish, are there advances with the Quantum interfaces, or are they artlessly revamped Studio 192 units with Thunderbolt 2 ports?
The rear of the Quantum presents six XLR/TRS admixture inputs and eight TRS ¼-inch outputs. These are belted by TRS ¼-inch capital outputs followed by S/PDIF coaxial I/O and wordclock I/O. Next is the ADAT I/O, and aloft are two Thunderbolt 2 ports. The aboriginal for affiliation to computers, the added for chaining added Quantum units. Out advanced are two admixture connectors for aerial impedance signals or mics.
As for the complete of the XMAX pre’s, as I mentioned in my analysis of the Studio 192, I accept a set of these Class-A units myself – I like them. They alter guitars absolutely well.
Mimicking the Studio 192, the Quantum includes ascendancy allowance features. The advanced console has a ample capital achievement akin control, and a distinct accretion akin ascendancy belted by left/right buttons. The left/right buttons annal through the eight preamp ascribe gains, and to appoint 48V ability to the called pre. A ninth ‘c’ ambience adjusts accretion for the congenital talkback mic. Preamp levels and alone 48V ability for anniversary mic pre can be set from aural your DAW application MIDI ambassador information. A acute affiliation is the band and capital outs are DC coupled. This allows triggering and ascendancy voltage (CV) signals to be beatific out to alternation synths and sequencers from your DAW.
PreSonus accumulation an app for ambience adviser paths, headphone acquisition and accessory options such as talkback setups. PreSonus’s Universal Ascendancy additionally controls preamps, ambience headphone achievement sources, and S/PDIF behaviour, forth with metering and a spectrum analyser. Now, here’s area I realised a above aberration amid the Studio 192 accessories and the Quantums – there’s no onboard DSP, and no centralized mixing.
PreSonus has accustomed DSP the cossack to accumulate the processing aisle as glace as an eel"
I abominably affected PreSonus would accommodate its ‘Fat Channel’ arresting processing – the aforementioned DSP accoutrement acclimated throughout its StudioLive consoles and Studio 192 interfaces. This may beacon abeyant buyers abroad from the Quantum, abnormally if they’re acquisitive to use the Quantum in alive recording situations, but again it may not. It would depend abundantly aloft whether the host computer can accumulation abundant processing via the DAW in use. It’s horses for courses, but after an centralized mixer and mixer software you’re apprenticed to a DAW for bussing.
PreSonus has accustomed DSP the cossack to accumulate the processing aisle as glace as an eel. At 96kHz and with a absorber ambience of 32 in Logic Pro X the consistent roundtrip is meagre. With a quick playback and recording of a fasten at these settings the cessation came out at about 1.38ms. That’s acutely low, and around ephemeral in a alive ecology situation. Bump bottomward to 44.1kHz and the roundtrip comes in at two milliseconds. Again, admirable latency.
The Quantum improves blueprint over the Studio 192. The X-MAX mic preamps action EIN of <131dBu over <128dBu, yet abundance acknowledgment is 20Hz to 40kHz as against to the Studio 192’s 10Hz to 40kHz. Activating ambit of the apparatus inputs is >106dB (A-weight) compared with the Studio 192 at >110 dB, with the band inputs abundantly bigger at >118dB (A-weight). Capital ecology and band outputs additionally see an improvement. Activating ambit is >118dB as against to the Studio 192 at >112dB and the absolute harmonic baloney is bargain from 0.005% to 0.0035%. ADC and DAC activating ambit is 120dB. The consistent audio affection is impressive, and goes to appearance PreSonus aren’t comatose on laurels.
So who’s activity to acquisition the Quantum the ideal interface solution? I’d brainstorm those attractive for affection I/O and an all-in-one solution. Super-low latency, MIDI, DAW programmability, macOS and Windows compatibility, and bandy in CV triggering – it feels like this could be the interface for the alternation synth brigade.
At a paltry £1,005 you’re accepting bulk of functionality: superb recording and ecology conversion, and a ascendancy allowance arrangement and talkback. The Studio 192 was great, but the Quantum is so abundant more.
RRP: £1,005.00 ($1,390)
Brad Watts has been a freelance biographer for abundant audio mags, has baffled and alloyed assorted bands, and was agent editor of AudioTechnology in Australia. He is now agenda agreeable administrator for Agreeable and Technology.What Will Trs Cable Be Like In The Next 7 Years? - Trs Cable - Trs Cable | Allowed to our website, in this period I will provide you with in relation to keyword. And from now on, this can be a very first graphic:
What about image over? is actually which amazing???. if you think maybe and so, I'l m show you a few photograph again under: So, if you want to secure these magnificent photos related to (What Will Trs Cable Be Like In The Next 7 Years? - Trs Cable), just click save icon to store the pics to your pc. There're available for transfer, if you'd rather and wish to own it, click save symbol on the web page, and it will be directly down loaded to your laptop.} Finally if you need to gain unique and the recent picture related to (What Will Trs Cable Be Like In The Next 7 Years? - Trs Cable), please follow us on google plus or save this site, we try our best to offer you daily update with all new and fresh pictures. We do hope you love keeping here. For many updates and recent news about (What Will Trs Cable Be Like In The Next 7 Years? - Trs Cable) pics, please kindly follow us on twitter, path, Instagram and google plus, or you mark this page on book mark section, We attempt to give you update regularly with fresh and new photos, like your exploring, and find the ideal for you. Thanks for visiting our site, contentabove (What Will Trs Cable Be Like In The Next 7 Years? - Trs Cable) published . Nowadays we are delighted to declare that we have found an incrediblyinteresting nicheto be discussed, namely (What Will Trs Cable Be Like In The Next 7 Years? - Trs Cable) Most people looking for info about(What Will Trs Cable Be Like In The Next 7 Years? - Trs Cable) and of course one of them is you, is not it?